Wild & Scenic |
Written by Bjorn Stromsness | |
Thursday, 06 December 2007 | |
So, what is Wild and Scenic anyway? It is a tool that my organization uses to protect rivers, but there are a lot of misconceptions about it. I wanted to write a little bit about exactly what it means. One of the best tools for long-term protection of many of our rivers and creeks comes from a federal Wild & Scenic Designation. There are actually two Wild & Scenic systems, one state and one federal. California's state system was stripped of most of it's real meat many years ago, so the best tool is the federal designation. Here is what the act actually says:
So, what does that mean? Well, it mostly deals with how federal lands are managed. If you owned a bit of property along a Wild and Scenic river it would not actually keep you from developing the land in accordance with the land use guidelines of your particular county, city or state. Lots of folks think it means these areas get locked up, but that is not it at all. It means that the areas have to be managed, from a Federal perspective, as to maintain the outstanding values of that river/area. If there is no Federal land around a particular river, it makes no sense to have such a designation and that's why Friends of the River and Cal Trout would not pursue such a designation. If a bit of river flowed through national forest or BLM land it would make the river a good target. The river would have to be preserved in it's free flowing state (no dams) and, if fishing were one of the outstanding features, fishing would have to be considered in any land use planning in that area of forest or BLM land. That could impact forestry, mining or road building. Here is a list of federally designated rivers in CA: http://www...v/wildriverslist.html#ca
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 06 December 2007 ) |
FeatherFisher |
Wild & Scenic
Jan 22 2008 18:05:54 ** This thread discusses the Content article: Wild & Scenic **
Good article, but it needs a bit of clarification. You say that the W&S designation "mostly" affects federal lands and imply that there could be some influence on how private lands are managed. As a (now retired) federal land manager, I can tell you with some certainty that the Federal designation has no effect on private lands. It doesn't just "mostly" affect federal lands; it only affects federal lands. Private lands may come into consideration in the decision to recommend designation (only Congress can make the actual decision). There isn't much point in recommending a river when the surrounding lands are in private ownership for federal designation. Its sort of a good news bad news situation. Folks are more receptive to a federal designation if they understand it does not impact their private property. But it does take out of consideration many rivers with mixed ownership. |
#5633 |
Next > |
---|